DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
153538P.pdf 02/22/2017 Brian Knowlton v. Anheuser-Busch Companies
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-3538
and No: 15-3851
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Murphy and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - ERISA. In action by former Sea World employees claiming they
were entitled to enhanced pension benefits under the defendant's salaried
employee pension plan, the district court correctly determined that
Section 19.11(f) of the plan entitled plaintiffs to enhanced pension
benefit; this decision is in accord with the Sixth Circuit's
interpretation of the provision in Adams v. Anheuser-Busch Cos., 758 F.3d
743 (6th Cir. 2014); with respect to plaintiff's cross-appeal, asserting
the district court erred by failing to make individual calculations of the
enhanced benefits owed to individual members of the class, the district
court erred in concluding that plaintiff's complaint sought only a
declaration that Section 19.11(f) applied, as their complaint made a
sufficient request for an actual award of certain benefits with the
application of the enhanced benefit; therefore, the matter of the
calculation of benefits is reversed and remanded with instructions to
reconsider the plaintiff's prayer for relief and, to the extent requested
and provable, calculate and award the benefits owed to plaintiffs by
applying Section 19.11(f); finally, on remand, the district court should
reconsider whether certain records concerning the absentee class members
will assist in its calculation of the requested benefits.