DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
153656P.pdf 02/16/2017 Gyronne Buckley v. Keith Ray
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-3656
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Colloton and Melloy, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Civil rights. The Attorney General's office defendants were
entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's claim that their actions in
accessing and referencing his expunged criminal record for his
compensation proceedings before the Arkansas Claims Commissions violated
his substantive due process rights; the mere act of violating the
expungement statute did not amount to a brutal and inhumane abuse of
official power literally shocking to the conscience; plaintiff failed to
articulate any legally-cognizable liberty interest created by the Arkansas
expungement statute, and defendants were entitled to qualified immunity on
his procedural due process claim; with respect to plaintiff's claim that a
misstatement of the record by the Attorney General during his testimony
before the legislative subcommittee considering the claim constituted
defamation, the Attorney General was entitled to absolute legislative
immunity; plaintiff's Section 1983 claims arising out of his wrongful
conviction accrued on the date the trial court invalidated his conviction,
and this action was brought more than three years after that date and the
claims were, therefore, time barred.