DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

153656P.pdf   02/16/2017  Gyronne Buckley  v.  Keith Ray
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-3656
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Colloton and Melloy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. The Attorney General's office defendants were entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's claim that their actions in accessing and referencing his expunged criminal record for his compensation proceedings before the Arkansas Claims Commissions violated his substantive due process rights; the mere act of violating the expungement statute did not amount to a brutal and inhumane abuse of official power literally shocking to the conscience; plaintiff failed to articulate any legally-cognizable liberty interest created by the Arkansas expungement statute, and defendants were entitled to qualified immunity on his procedural due process claim; with respect to plaintiff's claim that a misstatement of the record by the Attorney General during his testimony before the legislative subcommittee considering the claim constituted defamation, the Attorney General was entitled to absolute legislative immunity; plaintiff's Section 1983 claims arising out of his wrongful conviction accrued on the date the trial court invalidated his conviction, and this action was brought more than three years after that date and the claims were, therefore, time barred.