DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

153731P.pdf   01/03/2017  United States  v.  Rahmad Geddes
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-3731
                          and No:  16-3898
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Murphy and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's motion to sever a firearms count from the sex trafficking counts in the case, as the conduct took place over a short period of time on trip the defendant took with the victim and she would have been able to testify about the gun-related facts in a trial of the sex trafficking counts; in any event, there was little probability of prejudice given the relatively straightforward facts in the case; no error in permitting defendant's former girlfriend to testify about an incident in 2010 where defendant threatened her, as the jury was properly instructed on use of the testimony and the evidence's probative value outweighed any possible unfair prejudice; no error in permitting testimony from an expert in human trafficking; evidence was sufficient to support defendant's convictions on the sex trafficking counts.