DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
153731P.pdf 01/03/2017 United States v. Rahmad Geddes
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-3731
and No: 16-3898
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Murphy and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court did not abuse its
discretion by denying defendant's motion to sever a firearms count from
the sex trafficking counts in the case, as the conduct took place over a
short period of time on trip the defendant took with the victim and she
would have been able to testify about the gun-related facts in a trial of
the sex trafficking counts; in any event, there was little probability of
prejudice given the relatively straightforward facts in the case; no error
in permitting defendant's former girlfriend to testify about an incident
in 2010 where defendant threatened her, as the jury was properly
instructed on use of the testimony and the evidence's probative value
outweighed any possible unfair prejudice; no error in permitting testimony
from an expert in human trafficking; evidence was sufficient to support
defendant's convictions on the sex trafficking counts.