DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

153986P.pdf   02/14/2017  United States  v.  Corey Victor Bevins
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-3986
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
[PUBLISHED] [Chief Judge Riley, Author, with Wollman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Criminal Case - sentencing. Following guilty plea to producing, receiving, and possessing child pornography, district court varied downward from 720 months to 300 months imprisonment. Enhancements under Guidelines secs. 2G2.2(b)(4) and (b)(5) and 4B1.5(b)(1) had no impact of the Guidelines range. Any challenge to the grouping counts were harmless error. Enhancement for being a repeat and dangerous sex offender under section 4B1.5(b)(1) does not require a prior conviction; enhancement under sec. 2G2.1(b)(4) for sadistic or masochistic conduct were warranted; and the production counts were properly grouped under section 3D1.4 because each production is considered a separate and distinct harm. As to unobjected to challenge to the adequacy of the district court's explanation of the section 3553(a) factors, the district court's explanation, though brief, was not so plainly inadequate as to warrant reversal. The sentence, a downward variance of 420 months, was not unreasonably high.