DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

161022P.pdf   06/22/2017  S.S.  v.  Bellevue Medical Center
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1022
                          and No:  16-1024
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Kelly, Circuit Judge, and Sippel, District Judge] Civil case - Nebraska Hospital Medical Liability Act. Notice is not a requirement for qualification for the Act's protections, but rather a requirement imposed on those already qualified; the defendant was qualfied, and did not lose the Act's protections even if it failed to properly post notice regarding opt-out; damage cap in the Act does not violate the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial; nor does the Act violate the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause; the Act does not impair access to the courts by limiting recoverable damages; Equal Protections Clause challenged rejected;; substantive due process challenge rejected; defendant's challenges to three different jury instructions rejected.