161101P.pdf   12/05/2016  Great Lakes Gas Transmission  v.  Essar Steel Minnesota LLC
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1101
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Murphy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Natural Gas Act. The Natural Gas Act does not create an 
   express cause of action under which plaintiff could sue for recovery of 
   payments due under a federal tariff; nor does the Act create an implied 
   cause of action as there is no indication in the Act that Congress 
   intended to create a federal cause of action displacing traditional state 
   law breach of contract causes of action; the district court erred in 
   asserting jurisdiction over the claims because even if federal issues were 
   "necessarily raised" and "actually disputed," the federal issues were not 
   substantial, and a federal court could not exercise federal question 
   without disturbing the congressionally approved balance of federal and 
   state judicial responsibilities; judgment of the district court is vacated 
   and the case is remanded with directions to dismiss the case for lack of 
   jurisdiction.