161137P.pdf   07/13/2017  Stine Seed Company  v.  A & W Agribusiness, LLC
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1137
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Loken and Colloton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil Case - diversity. The district court's finding that Williams did not 
   sign relevant documents was not clear error, nor is the finding that 
   Williams did not ratify the Note by his words or actions; there was no 
   legal error in the conclusion that Williams was not liable to Stine Seed 
   under an implied-in-fact contract claim, as he was unaware of the seed 
   purchase and could not have manifested assent to terms of which he was 
   unaware; the district court did not err in concluding there was a lack of 
   sufficient evidence showing unjust enrichment. The district court erred in 
   finding Alexander had no authority to bind A&W, because it should have 
   found Alexander had apparent authority to do so, as A&W admitted to such 
   apparent authority in discovery responses. Judgment in favor of A&W on 
   Stine Seed's claim for breach of contract is reversed. In all other 
   respects, the judgment is affirmed.