DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

161175P.pdf   04/18/2017  Jacques Slocum  v.  Wendy Kelley
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1175
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff   
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Wollman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - habeas. The district court did not err in finding Slocum's claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a competency hearing and failing to present mitigating evidence during the sentencing phase of his murder trial were procedurally defaulted; there was no objective evidence that Slocum suffered from any medical illness and his attorney was not deficient for failing to request a competency hearing; counsel's failure to present any mitigating evidence during sentencing did not fall below an objective standard of reasonableness; the decision not to have Slocum testify was a reasonable strategic decision given his lack of credibility and prior record; further, since Slocum refused to let his wife testify, counsel had not other witness who could present mitigating evidence.