DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

161223P.pdf   12/08/2016  The Gap, Inc.  v.  GK Development, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1223
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo   
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Wollman, Circuit Judge] Civil case - Contracts. Defendant waived its argument that the parties' lease required plaintiff to pay HVAC expenses under a particular lease provision; reading ambiguous lease language in conjunction with extrinsic evidence offered by plaintiff a rational factfinder could only conclude that the parties intended that plaintiff not be obligated to pay certain expenses associated with operation of the shopping mall during the life of the lease; however, the district court's determination that plaintiff had no obligation to pay certain common area maintenance or HVAC expenses for the duration of the lease was too broad and on remand the district court should modify the declaratory judgment to state plaintiff had no obligation to pay the expenses except as established under one specific lease provision.