DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

161391P.pdf   06/05/2017  United States  v.  Charles Ahumada
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1391
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Beam and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The state trooper's action in briefly  detaining 
   defendant after a traffic stop for a drug-dog sniff was  objectively reasonable 
   under then-binding circuit precedent, and the  district court did not 
   err in denying the motion to suppress the evidence seized following the 
   sniff; evidence was sufficient to support defendant's  conviction for 
   possession of heroin with intent to distribute.