DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
161412P.pdf 06/16/2017 Rodney Brossart v. Kelly Janke
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-1412
U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Civil rights. The record supported the district court's
conclusion that Rodney Brossart made threats of violence against law
enforcement officers, repeatedly refused to comply with officers' orders
to cooperate in a potentially criminal investigation and then resisted
handcuffing when he was told he was under arrest; under these
circumstances, defendant Braathen's use of a taser to subdue Rodney was a
reasonable use of significant non-lethal force; even if repeated use of
the taser when Rodney failed to comply was unreasonable, repeated use of
the taser did not violate clearly established law, and defendant Braathen
was entitled to qualified immunity on Rodney's excessive force claim; with
respect to Thomas Broassart's claim that Braathen's use of a taser when
Brosart failed to obey an order to move over once he was arrested and
detained in a squad car was excessive force, the district court did not
err in finding the use of the taser was not excessive force under all of
the circumstances; claim for supervisory liability against defendant
Sheriff Janke rejected as his deputy did not use excessive force; County's
taser plan was facially constitutional; plaintiffs' failure to train claim
against the County is foreclosed by the the court's conclusion that
Braathen's tasing of the Brosarts did not constitute excessive force; the
district court did not err in finding plaintiffs' state law claims were
time-barred. Judge Kelly, concurring part and dissenting in part.