161759P.pdf   03/21/2018  Disability Support Alliance  v.  Heartwood Enterprises, LLC
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1759
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Murphy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Americans with Disabilities Act. In action alleging exterior 
   barriers to an office building violated the ADA and the Minnesota Human 
   Rights Act and constituted a bias offense under Minnesota Statutes Sec. 
   611A.79, the district court correctly determined plaintiff Wong made a 
   sufficient showing of actual injury to establish standing at the summary 
   judgment stage of the case; concerning the merits, defendants met any 
   applicable burden to establish that removal of the barriers was not 
   readily achievable and plaintiff failed to refute the evidence, and the 
   district court did not err in granting defendant's motion for summary 
   judgment; on the same analysis, the district court did not err in granting 
   defendant summary judgment on the MHRA claim; since a finding that the 
   defendant committed a bias offense is dependent on a finding that the 
   defendant violated the MHRA, the court properly dismissed this claim.