DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

161763P.pdf   01/05/2018  James Boyd  v.  ConAgra Foods, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1763
                          and No:  16-3443
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Wollman and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Civil case - ERISA. In action to recover severance benefits based on a claim that defendant, after acquiring Ralcorp, plaintiff's former employer, had materially reduced his position, duties or responsibilities, thereby allowing him to self-terminate and obtain the benefits, the district court did not err in reviewing the Plan Administrator's decision under an abuse-of-discretion standard; giving any potential conflict of interest defendant had as both the plan sponsor and administrator some weight, the decision that plaintiff lacked good reason to self-terminate his employment was reasonable and was not an abuse of the Plan Administrator's discretion; the district court did not err in finding defendant did not breach a fiduciary duty to plaintiff as plaintiff did not show that he had right to reasonable rely on a claimed misstatement; the law suit was not frivolous, and plaintiff was entitled, under the provisions of the Plan, to recover his attorney's fees.