DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
161860P.pdf 01/19/2018 United States v. Gilbert Lundstrom
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-1860
and No: 16-2313
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln
[PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Arnold and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. In prosecution of the former
Chief Executive Officer of TierOne Bank, the evidence was sufficient for
the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant possessed the
knowledge of the conspiracy and the intent to defraud necessary to sustain
his conspiracy and fraud convictions; the government provided defendant
with the discovery needed for him to understand the nature of the charges,
prepare a defense and avoid any surprise, and the district court did not
err in denying his motion for a bill of particulars; evidentiary
challenges rejected; no error in giving a willful blindness instruction or
in refusing to give defendant's proposed advice-of-counsel instruction; no
error in calculating the amount of the loss attributable to defendant's
offense conduct under Guidelines Sec. 2B1.1(b)(1); no error in imposing a
leadership enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 3B1.1(a) as defendant
directed or enlisted subordinates and the fraud was "otherwise extensive;"
claim that defendant's 132-month sentence, which was a downward variance
from this Guidelines range of 360 months, was substantively unreasonable
rejected; where, as here, a district court varies below a correctly
calculated Guidelines sentence, it is nearly inconceivable that the court
abused its discretion in not varying downward still further; $3.12 million
restitution award affirmed; for restitution purposes, where a defendant's
fraudulent conduct entices victims to enter the market in the first place,
the defendant assumes responsibility for their losses, including those
resulting from market forces.