DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

161903P.pdf   04/06/2017  United States  v.  Bruce Charles Tollefson
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1903
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo   
[PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Beam and Benton, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court's standing order appointing the Federal Public Defender to handle all motions for sentence reduction under Amendment 782 did not violate defendant's Sixth Amendment rights; defendants do not have a due process right to self-representation in postconviction sentence reduction proceedings; the district court was not required to entertain pro se motions filed by a represented party; there is no right to counsel during a postconviction proceeding and a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel necessarily fails; the district court did not err in denying defendant's motion for a reduction of sentence after considering the 3553(a) factors, the offense conduct and defendant's post-sentencing accomplishments.