161914P.pdf   06/21/2017  United States  v.  George Thunderhawk
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1914
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck   
   [PUBLISHED] Loken, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Restitution. For the court's prior opinion in the matter, 
   see United States v. Thunderhawk, 799 F.3d 1203 (8th Cir. 2015). The 
   district court gave defendant notice at sentencing that restitution would 
   be ordered and scheduled a hearing regarding the amount; the court stayed 
   the hearing pending final resolution of defendant's appeal, and then 
   issued a restitution order after this court issued its mandate; where 
   defendant had notice that restitution would be required and the delay did 
   not prejudice him, the restitution order was not an abuse of the district 
   court's discretion; the evidence was sufficient to show that defendant's 
   actions were the proximate cause of defendant's medical costs; the 
   district court did not err in directing defendant and the Probation Office 
   to develop a suitable schedule of payments when he is released; this order 
   is not an improper delegation of judicial authority because the plan will 
   be subject to judicial review and approval.