161918P.pdf   07/14/2017  I.Z.M.  v.  Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1918
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil Case - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. On appeal from 
   the district court's conclusion that the District took steps to provide 
   I.Z.M. accessible instructional materials in a timely manner, that I.Z.M. 
   received an educational benefit from the services provided, and that to 
   the extent the District imperfectly complied with IEP requirements, the 
   IDEA does not require perfection, the district court did not err in 
   applying an incorrect standard. State law did not impose a heightened 
   standard to guarantee that a blind student will use Braille instruction 
   provided to attain a specific level of proficiency, only that the 
   instruction is sufficient to enable attainment of a specified level of 
   proficiency; Department of Education regulations do not create a 
   heightened "strict" compliance standard; the District took all reasonable 
   steps to provide instructional materials in accessible formats in a timely 
   manner. Because the district court concluded I.Z.M. failed to present 
   evidence of bad faith or gross misjudgment, the dismissal of the non-IDEA 
   claims is affirmed.