162197P.pdf   06/09/2017  Christopher Kiesling  v.  Ross Spurlock
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-2197
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Riley, Circuit Judge, and Gritzner, 
   District Judge] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. The district court erred in finding defendant 
   Spurlock was not entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's claim that 
   a search violated his civil rights; it was not entirely unreasonable for 
   Spurlock to believe that the affidavit he provided in the warrant 
   application contained sufficient indicia of probable cause for the search 
   and seizure of the items listed in the warrant; the affidavit provided 
   probable cause to believe that plaintiff was keeping deer in violation of 
   state law, and the list of items to be seized included items which were 
   either related to the capture and sale of wildlife or would aid in the 
   prosecution of the criminal act at issue. Judge Gritzner, dissenting.