DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
162436P.pdf 07/24/2017 United States v. Ryan William McMillan
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-2436
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul
[PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Gruender and Kelly, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court erred in finding
defendant's conviction for third degree riot for the benefit of a gang in
violation of Minn. Stat. Sec. 609.71, Subd. 3 (2009) was a crime of
violence for sentencing purposes because the offense does not
automatically qualify as a crime of violence under the force clause of
Guidelines Sec. 4B1.2(a)(1) as the statute encompasses crimes against
property; the offense may, however, qualify under the 2015 version of the
residual clause of Guidelines Sec. 4B1.2(a) which was in effect at the
time of sentencing; the matter is remanded, therefore, to permit the
district court to determine whether the conviction qualified under the
residual clause and, if so, whether the district court should consider the
proposed amendment to the section which was pending at the time. Judge
Gruender, dissenting.