DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

162436P.pdf   07/24/2017  United States  v.  Ryan William McMillan
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-2436
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
[PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Gruender and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court erred in finding defendant's conviction for third degree riot for the benefit of a gang in violation of Minn. Stat. Sec. 609.71, Subd. 3 (2009) was a crime of violence for sentencing purposes because the offense does not automatically qualify as a crime of violence under the force clause of Guidelines Sec. 4B1.2(a)(1) as the statute encompasses crimes against property; the offense may, however, qualify under the 2015 version of the residual clause of Guidelines Sec. 4B1.2(a) which was in effect at the time of sentencing; the matter is remanded, therefore, to permit the district court to determine whether the conviction qualified under the residual clause and, if so, whether the district court should consider the proposed amendment to the section which was pending at the time. Judge Gruender, dissenting.