DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

162644P.pdf   06/20/2017  United States  v.  Andrew Peterson
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-2644
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Colloton and Beam, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not rule on defendant's 
   objections to the PSR because the objected-to material did not affect 
   sentencing, and defendant had no right to be resentenced when the district 
   court expressly states it has not relied on the challenged information; 
   the court's decision to make defendant's federal sentence consecutive to 
   his state sentence was reasonable and was not an abuse of the court's 
   discretion.