163063P.pdf   09/07/2017  Jennifer Heglund  v.  City of Grand Rapids
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3063
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Civil case - Driver's Privacy Protection Act. Plaintiffs have standing to 
   bring their DPPA claims as they alleged that defendant Scherf had violated 
   DPPA's substantive protections by invading plaintiff Jennifer Heglund's 
   privacy, and the intangible harm associated with an alleged violation of 
   the DPPA's substantive protections is sufficient to establish an injury in 
   fact for standing purposes; the district court did not err in determining 
   plaintiffs' claims were untimely; equitable estopped does not apply as 
   defendant City of Grand Rapids did not engage in any misleading conduct; 
   amended complaint did not relate back as substituting defendant Scherf for 
   a John Doe defendant is not a mistake under Rule 15(c).