DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

163149P.pdf   05/07/2018  Stacy Ryan  v.  Constance Ryan
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3149
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Wollman and Melloy, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Securities. In action alleging defendants self-dealing and 
   manipulation of a stock evaluation process, among other claims, violated 
   Nebraska and federal securities law, as well as their fiduciary duty to 
   plaintiff, the district court did not err in granting defendants' motion 
   to dismiss as plaintiff did not plausibly plea that the defendants' 
   wrongful acts caused her loss; the district court did not abuse its 
   discretion in denying the motion to alter or amend the judgment; the 
   district court erred, however, in denying plaintiff's Rule 59(e) motion 
   with respect to a claim of newly-discovered evidence regarding plaintiff's 
   breach of contract claim, and the matter is remanded for further 
   proceeding on this issue.