DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
163219P.pdf 08/02/2017 Victor Gresham v. Lori Swanson
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-3219
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Kelly, Circuit
Judge]
Civil case - Constitutional law. In action challenging the
constitutionality of Minn. Stat. Section 325E.27 restricting the use of
robocalls, the district court did not err in denying plaintiff's request
for a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the statute as it was
unlikely plaintiff would succeed on the merits of his claims; the district
court did not err in determining, based on this court's decision in Van
Bergen v. Minnesota, 59 F.3d 1541 (8th Cir. 1995), that the restrictions
contained in section (b) of the statute are reasonable time, place and
manner restrictions; nor did the court err in finding that a 2009
content-based amendment creating an exception for tax-exempt charitable
organizations was severable; Citizens United and other recent Supreme
Court cases do not supersede Van Bergen and it controls this case.