DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
163260P.pdf 12/06/2017 CeCelia Ibson v. United Healthcare Services
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-3260
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Wollman and Beam, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - ERISA. For the court's prior opinion in the matter, see Ibson
v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc.., 776 F.3d 941 (8th Cir. 2014). Whether
plaintiff's claim to recover benefits related to her deceased husband's
medical care are "unpaid benefits" under Section 1132(a)(1)(B) or
extra-contractual damages forbidden under ERISA, the proper party to bring
the claim is her late husband's estate; claim for the same benefits could
not be maintained as an equitable claim; plaintiff could state an
equitable claim for restitution of the premiums paid to defendant if there
was a plan violation; remanded to the district court to determine
initially if there was such a plan violation and, if so, whether
restitution of the premiums is appropriate equitable relief under Sec.
1132(a)(3)(B); district court did not err in determining defendant was not
the plan administrator for purposes of Sec. 1132(c)(1)(B); plaintiff's
breach of contract claim was preempted by ERISA.