DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

163294P.pdf   07/21/2017  United States  v.  Craig Giboney
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3294
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Arnold, 
   Circuit Judge] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court did not err in 
   determining defendant's pre-arrest statements were admissible as, 
   considering the totality of the circumstances, the interview was not 
   custodial, and defendant did not have to be advised of his Miranda rights; 
   the court did not err in determining defendant's post-arrest statements 
   were admissible as he did not clearly and unequivocally request the 
   assistance of counsel before he answered the police officer's questions 
   and admitted committing the offense.