DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

163308P.pdf   07/27/2017  United States  v.  Joseph Lewis
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3308
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Gruender, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law. Defendant failed to show he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a work area of the tattoo shop where he worked, and the police officers' entrance into the work area did not violate defendant's Fourth Amendment rights; when the officers seized defendant's handgun, which was on a shelf in his work area, they did not know he was a felon and the incriminating character of the weapon was not immediately apparent; as a result, the officer could not seize the handgun under the plain-view exception to warrantless searches; however, given that the government has a legitimate interest in officer safety and that temporary seizure of the weapons was less intrusive than a Terry frisk, the officers could temporarily seize the handgun, which was in plain view, so long as a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances would be warranted in the belief that his or her safety or that of others was in danger; applying this standard, under these circumstances, a reasonable officer could not draw specific reasonable inferences from the facts to justify seizure of the gun, as the officers did not suspect defendant or any customer of wrongdoing and defendant did not engage in any behavior indicating he posed a threat to the officers; as a result, the government failed to carry its burden to show that the initial warrantless seizure of the handgun was permitted.