DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
163308P.pdf 07/27/2017 United States v. Joseph Lewis
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-3308
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Gruender,
Circuit Judge]
Criminal case - Criminal law. Defendant failed to show he had a reasonable
expectation of privacy in a work area of the tattoo shop where he worked,
and the police officers' entrance into the work area did not violate
defendant's Fourth Amendment rights; when the officers seized defendant's
handgun, which was on a shelf in his work area, they did not know he was a
felon and the incriminating character of the weapon was not immediately
apparent; as a result, the officer could not seize the handgun under the
plain-view exception to warrantless searches; however, given that the
government has a legitimate interest in officer safety and that temporary
seizure of the weapons was less intrusive than a Terry frisk, the officers
could temporarily seize the handgun, which was in plain view, so long as a
reasonably prudent person in the circumstances would be warranted in the
belief that his or her safety or that of others was in danger; applying
this standard, under these circumstances, a reasonable officer could not
draw specific reasonable inferences from the facts to justify seizure of
the gun, as the officers did not suspect defendant or any customer of
wrongdoing and defendant did not engage in any behavior indicating he
posed a threat to the officers; as a result, the government failed to
carry its burden to show that the initial warrantless seizure of the
handgun was permitted.