DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

163437P.pdf   07/05/2018  Ken Ross, Jr.  v.  Special Administrative Board
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3437
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case- St. Louis School Desegregation Case. Plaintiffs alleged the State of Missouri was reallocating certain tax proceeds to St. Louis charter school in violation of the 1999 Desegregation Settlement Agreement, and charter school parents sought leave to intervene in the matter; the district court denied the motion to intervene on the grounds that the parents lacked an injury in fact as required to establish standing to intervene; the district court erred in so concluding, as the parents' pleading allege the charter schools will suffer a loss of funding and a decline in funding if the plaintiffs prevail; if plaintiffs are successful, tens of millions of dollars could be transferred from the charter schools, and such an injury is neither conjectural nor hypothetical and is sufficiently imminent to constitute an injury in fact; further, the charter parents have establish that their injury is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the State of Missouri and that their injury is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision; the matter is reversed and remanded to the district court to permit it to determine in the first instance whether the charter parents meet the requirements under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 for intervention as of right or for permissive intervention.