DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

163619P.pdf   08/22/2017  Urvashi Patel  v.  Jefferson B. Sessions, III
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3619
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Murphy and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. Where the issue was whether petitioner's marriage to her former husband, a U.S. citizen, was a good faith one, the IJ erred in admitting an affidavit from the former husband alleging it was not because it deprived petitioner of the right to cross-examine him; the opportunity to examine the affidavit and the USCIS report at the hearing was insufficient, and the failure to produce the former husband or issue the subpoena sought by petitioner prejudiced her; the affidavit and the USCIS report were the only evidence directly contradicting petitioner's evidence that the marriage was legitimate, and the IJ and BIA both relied on these documents to support their conclusion that petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving a good faith marriage; further, the BIA abused its discretion in denying petitioner's motion to remand based on her now-husband's pending visa application on her behalf, which would have given petitioner the opportunity to adjust status independent of the conditional status she received by virtue of her first marriage; the BIA's reliance on 8 U.S.C. Section 1182(a)(6)(C)(i)'s mandate of inadmissibility for fraud in a case devoid of even an accusation of fraud fails to provide a rational explanation for the decision to decline the request for remand.