DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
163619P.pdf 08/22/2017 Urvashi Patel v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-3619
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Murphy and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
Petition for Review - Immigration. Where the issue was whether
petitioner's marriage to her former husband, a U.S. citizen, was a good
faith one, the IJ erred in admitting an affidavit from the former husband
alleging it was not because it deprived petitioner of the right to
cross-examine him; the opportunity to examine the affidavit and the USCIS
report at the hearing was insufficient, and the failure to produce the
former husband or issue the subpoena sought by petitioner prejudiced her;
the affidavit and the USCIS report were the only evidence directly
contradicting petitioner's evidence that the marriage was legitimate, and
the IJ and BIA both relied on these documents to support their conclusion
that petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving a good faith
marriage; further, the BIA abused its discretion in denying petitioner's
motion to remand based on her now-husband's pending visa application on
her behalf, which would have given petitioner the opportunity to adjust
status independent of the conditional status she received by virtue of her
first marriage; the BIA's reliance on 8 U.S.C. Section 1182(a)(6)(C)(i)'s
mandate of inadmissibility for fraud in a case devoid of even an
accusation of fraud fails to provide a rational explanation for the
decision to decline the request for remand.