163770P.pdf   04/03/2018  Lauren Hales  v.  Casey's Marketing Company
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3770
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Shepherd, Circuit Judge, and Goldberg, 
   District Judge] 
   Civil case - Employment Discrimination. The pendency of an EEOC review 
   does not toll a state civil rights claim and plaintiff's claim under the 
   Iowa Civil Rights Act was properly dismissed as time-barred; the actions 
   of the store customer in the incident in question did not constitute 
   conduct so severe or pervasive to affect a term, condition or privilege of 
   plaintiff's employment, and the district court did not err in granting 
   defendant summary judgment on her claim of hostile work environment; 
   further, plaintiff failed to show defendant knew of the customer's 
   harassing conduct but failed to take remedial action; district court did 
   not err in excluding evidence of plaintiff's previous sexual assault and 
   her related therapy under Federal Rule of Evidence 401; the district court 
   did not err in finding plaintiff's retaliation claim was time-barred.