DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
163784P.pdf 12/06/2018 James Stuart v. State Farm Fire, etc.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-3784
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Wollman and Erickson, Circuit Judges]
Civil Case - class certification. District court certified a class of
Arkansas homeowners who alleged that State Farm improperly withheld
amounts for labor depreciation between 2008 and 2013 when calculating the
actual cash value (ACV)of damaged property. It was not an abuse of
discretion for the district court to conclude the insured shared a common,
predominating question of law. This court's decision in In Re: State Farm
Fire & Casualty Co., 872 F.3d 567 (8th Cir. 2017) (applying Missouri law)
does not control the claims at issue because Arkansas explicitly prohibits
insurer from depreciating labor costs when using the formula to calculate
ACV, and the district court's conclusion that common questions predominate
over individualized issues was not an abuse of discretion. State Farm's
argument that some plaintiffs cannot demonstrate injury-in-fact does not
mean they lack standing to sue and go to the merits of the claims, not
before the court on the certification question. The certification order is
amended to exclude those subject to a different class action.