DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

163784P.pdf   12/06/2018  James Stuart  v.  State Farm Fire, etc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3784
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana   
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Wollman and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - class certification. District court certified a class of Arkansas homeowners who alleged that State Farm improperly withheld amounts for labor depreciation between 2008 and 2013 when calculating the actual cash value (ACV)of damaged property. It was not an abuse of discretion for the district court to conclude the insured shared a common, predominating question of law. This court's decision in In Re: State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 872 F.3d 567 (8th Cir. 2017) (applying Missouri law) does not control the claims at issue because Arkansas explicitly prohibits insurer from depreciating labor costs when using the formula to calculate ACV, and the district court's conclusion that common questions predominate over individualized issues was not an abuse of discretion. State Farm's argument that some plaintiffs cannot demonstrate injury-in-fact does not mean they lack standing to sue and go to the merits of the claims, not before the court on the certification question. The certification order is amended to exclude those subject to a different class action.