DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
163861P.pdf 05/11/2018 United States v. Jesse Benton
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-3861
and No: 16-3862
and No: 16-3864
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
[PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Loken, Circuit Judge, and Nelson,
District Judge]
Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court properly interpreted the
reporting provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act; the jury was
entitled to infer from the facts presented that defendants Benton and Tate
had knowingly and willfully caused Election Commission reports to be filed
which falsely portrayed a $25,000 payment to an Iowa State Senator for his
endorsement of Ron Paul in the 2012 presidential primary campaign as
payments to an audio/visual vendor; applying 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1519 to the
facts of this case was proper, and defendants' convictions for making and
filing false reports of campaign expenditures are affirmed; defendants'
convictions under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001(a)(1) are affirmed, as the false
statements in the reports were material; defendants' conspiracy
convictions are affirmed; claim that convictions on the counts was
multiplicitous rejected; no error in denying defendant Tate's motion to
sever; no error in rejecting defendant Benton's proposed jury
instructions; various challenges to evidentiary rulings (exclusion of
defense experts, admission of the check used to make payment; admission of
an email) rejected; claim of a Jencks Act violation rejected.