DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

163861P.pdf   05/11/2018  United States  v.  Jesse Benton
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3861
                          and No:  16-3862
                          and No:  16-3864
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
[PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Loken, Circuit Judge, and Nelson, District Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court properly interpreted the reporting provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act; the jury was entitled to infer from the facts presented that defendants Benton and Tate had knowingly and willfully caused Election Commission reports to be filed which falsely portrayed a $25,000 payment to an Iowa State Senator for his endorsement of Ron Paul in the 2012 presidential primary campaign as payments to an audio/visual vendor; applying 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1519 to the facts of this case was proper, and defendants' convictions for making and filing false reports of campaign expenditures are affirmed; defendants' convictions under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001(a)(1) are affirmed, as the false statements in the reports were material; defendants' conspiracy convictions are affirmed; claim that convictions on the counts was multiplicitous rejected; no error in denying defendant Tate's motion to sever; no error in rejecting defendant Benton's proposed jury instructions; various challenges to evidentiary rulings (exclusion of defense experts, admission of the check used to make payment; admission of an email) rejected; claim of a Jencks Act violation rejected.