DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

164008P.pdf   01/05/2018  United States  v.  Robert Sharp
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-4008
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids   
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Wollman, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea to charges that he conspired to manufacture and distribute a controlled substance and possessed controlled substances with intent to distribute; claims that his attorney had a conflict of interest because he was a vital witness as to defendant's mens rea rejected as defendant had failed to show that counsel's advice to plead guilty was linked to the conflict; claim that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by misinforming defendant about willful blindness rejected as counsel reasonably believed the government could show that defendant had actual knowledge that the substance he was distributing was a controlled substance; further, there was a factual basis for the plea; the evidence elicited at sentencing neither rehabilitated defendant's credibility not undermined the evidence of his guilt, and the district court did not err in failing to sua sponte reconsider the motion to withdraw the plea.