DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

164315P.pdf   04/26/2018  United States  v.  Jody Goldsberry
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-4315
                          and No:  16-4327
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Kelly, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in imposing a sentencing enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 2K2.1(b)(1)(A) for possession of three to seven firearms as the evidence was sufficient to show defendant had actual or constructive possession of a sufficient number of firearms to apply the enhancement; with respect to the court's decision to impose an enhancement for defendant's 2009 conviction for assault on a police officer, any error in imposing the enhancement was harmless in light of the court's statement that it would have imposed the same sentence without the enhancement; defendant's Missouri second-degree burglary conviction was not a qualifying predicate offense under the Armed Career Criminal Act - see U.S. v. Naylor, 2018 WL 1630249 (8th Cir. 2018)(en banc).