DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

171091P.pdf   05/02/2018  Smoky Hills Wind Project II  v.  City of Independence, Missouri
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1091
                          and No:  17-1171
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Kelly, Circuit Judge] Civil case - Contracts. The parties' contract for the provision of wind-generated electric power provided that defendant could be billed for economic curtailments, and the district court did not err in determining defendant was liable for the costs associated with the specified economic curtailments; under the provisions of the parties' agreement, plaintiff timely billed defendant for the curtailment costs by submitting the bills as part of its monthly billing invoices; the district court did not err in interpreting the contract's provision governing "emergency curtailment;" nor did the court err in concluding plaintiff had not over-allocated power to defendant beyond the share it had contracted to receive.