DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
171091P.pdf 05/02/2018 Smoky Hills Wind Project II v. City of Independence, Missouri
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-1091
and No: 17-1171
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Kelly, Circuit
Judge]
Civil case - Contracts. The parties' contract for the provision of
wind-generated electric power provided that defendant could be billed for
economic curtailments, and the district court did not err in determining
defendant was liable for the costs associated with the specified economic
curtailments; under the provisions of the parties' agreement, plaintiff
timely billed defendant for the curtailment costs by submitting the bills
as part of its monthly billing invoices; the district court did not err in
interpreting the contract's provision governing "emergency curtailment;"
nor did the court err in concluding plaintiff had not over-allocated power
to defendant beyond the share it had contracted to receive.