171140P.pdf   08/02/2018  United States  v.  Anthony King
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1140
                          and No:  17-1976
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Wollman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. In prosecution for operating 
   a pill mill, the admission of Prescription Monitoring Program data offered 
   by the government was not not erroneous as the information in the data was 
   corroborated by other evidence; no error in admitting testimony from the 
   government's physician expert regarding standard of medical care and the 
   PMP data; no error in admitting testimony from defendant Raines's 
   co-worker and fellow nurse regarding her observations and knowledge as it 
   was circumstantial evidence on defendant Raines's knowledge or willful 
   blindness; any error in admitting a videotape of the pill mill's operation 
   shot by an informant was harmless as the video was cumulative and 
   consistent with the extensive testimony concerning daily operations at the 
   clinic; no error in giving a willful blindness instruction; no error in 
   rejecting defendant Raines's good faith instruction as it was not an 
   accurate statement of the law; evidence was sufficient to support Raines's 
   conviction for conspiracy to distribute controlled substances without an 
   effective prescription; Raines's challenge to drug quantity calculations 
   rejected; no error in imposing an abuse-of-trust enhancement for defendant 
   Raines; both Raines's and King's sentences were substantively reasonable.