DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

171202P.pdf   10/22/2018  Larry Zubrod  v.  Shayne Hoch
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1202
                          and No:  17-1324
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Waterloo   
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Chief Judge and Colloton, Circuit Judge] Civil Case - civil Rights. This decision is filed by Chief Judge Smith and Judge Colloton under 8th Cir. Rule 47E. Officers responded to a domestic disturbance seeing Michael Zubrod attacking his girlfriend; officers engaged in struggle to subdue Zubrod and deployed multiple rounds of a taser until eventually handcuffing Zubrod. Zubrod suffered a cardia arrythmia and died. In a multi-count civil rights action brought by Zubrod's parents, alleging Fourth Amendment claims of excessive force and state law claims against the officers, the County, and the sheriff, the district court granted summary judgment to the officers and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. On appeal, appellants argue material factual disputes preclude summary judgment. Unsworn statements from paramedics to law enforcement were properly excluded and the district properly disregarded them; Iowa's false statement statute does not implicitly swear a declarant making a statement to law enforcement. Viewing the record in the light most favorable to the Zubrods, there is no genuine dispute that Michael posed a threat to the safety of the officers and the victim and no competent, admissible evidence rebuts the officers' version of the events. Having concluded that there was no constitutional violation because the actions of the officers were objectively reasonable, there is no need to consider whether the right in question was clearly established. Grant of summary judgment on the federal claims is affirmed. In the cross-appeal, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims.