DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

171236P.pdf   04/24/2018  United States  v.  Sandra Bart
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1236
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Wollman and Loken, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to support 
   defendant's convictions for conspiracy to commit visa fraud, fraud in 
   foreign labor contracting and mail and wire fraud; incident defendant 
   relied on to support her motions to question the jurors and grant a new 
   trial - that an Assistant U.S. Attorney heard a juror say the word 
   "guilty" in the presence of other jurors in an elevator - was insufficient 
   to show the jurors had discussed the case or, if they did, that they 
   considered improper evidence; further, the court offered an appropriate 
   curative instruction before the jury began its deliberations.