DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

171335P.pdf   10/22/2018  United States  v.  Marcos De La Torre
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1335
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Chief Judge, Author, with Beam and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Criminal Case - conviction. In this direct criminal appeal, the district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress, as the facts support the finding of a fair probability that evidence of a drug crime would be found in the location; there was no error in denying the motion to dismiss on Speedy Trial Act grounds, as more than enough time was excludable due to pending motions or pretrial motions to avoid a violation; the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting into evidence a poor quality recording, as it was sufficient to provide the jury with the gist of the conversation and there was no plain error in giving the jury the limiting instruction to prevent consideration of inadmissible hearsay; admission of text messages was not error as witness qualified as a coconspirator and the messages were not hearsay; sufficient evidence supported the verdicts.