DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
171339P.pdf 04/14/2017 Tammy Hargett v. St. Bernard's Hospital Inc, et
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-1339
and No: 17-1340
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Bowman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Civil Case - Class Action Fairness Act. Under the local controversy
exception, the term citizen means the same thing in 28 U.S.C. sec.
1332(d)(4)(A)(i)(I) as it does in the rest of section 1332 and that
definition is not synonymous with "resident." The district court erred in
holding that merely alleging a proposed class of Arkansas residents was
sufficient to satisfy section 1332(d)(4); it could have met the burden by
producing evidence or defining the class to include only Arkansas
citizens. Consideration of the amended complaint that redefined the class
after removal was error. For purposes of the local-controversy exception
in section 1332(d)(7), class citizenship must be determined as of the date
of the pleading giving federal jurisdiction. Nothing stated herein means
that the district court lacked jurisdiction. The remand order is reversed
and the case remanded to the district court for further proceedings.