DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

171377P.pdf   06/28/2018  Jennie Loeffler  v.  City of Duluth
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1377
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Murphy and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Driver's Privacy Protection Act. This opinion is filed by Judge Gruender and Judge Kelly pursuant to the provisions of 8th Cir. R. 47E as a result of Judge Murphy's death. The district court did not err in dismissing plaintiff's claims against defendant Kopp as untimely under the statute; plaintiff's amended complaint did not relate back under this court's holding in Heglund v. Aitkin Cty., 871 F.3d 572 (8th Cir. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S.Ct. 749 (2018); plaintiff failed to state a claim for direct municipal liability against the City of Duluth because she failed to plead sufficient facts supporting an inference that the City knowingly allowed Kopp to access the database for any reason other than her official duties; plaintiff failed to preserve any claim for vicarious liability against the City, and the court would not consider the claim for the first time on appeal.