DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

171493P.pdf   06/25/2018  United States  v.  Coleman Tuton
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1493
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana   
[PUBLISHED] Loken, Author, with Gruender and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. Claim that police officer unconstitutionally seized defendant when the officer asked the driver of the bus in which defendant was riding if there was any contraband in the bus and if the officer could search the bus was without merit, as the driver consented to the search and defendant was not seized during the search; while defendant had a protected privacy interest in his properly tagged luggage stowed in the bus's luggage compartment, the officer's search of the bag under the mistaken belief it was abandoned, did not make his conduct after discovering the mistake (having a drug dog sniff the entire luggage compartment) unlawful, and all evidence suggests the officer's mistake was an isolated instance of negligence which occurred during a bona fide investigation; as a result, the exclusionary rule did not require suppression of the drugs found in the bag; the drug dog's general alert, under these circumstances, gave officers probable cause to search the handful of bags, including defendant's, contained in the compartment. Judge Kelly, dissenting.