DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
171493P.pdf 06/25/2018 United States v. Coleman Tuton
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-1493
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana
[PUBLISHED] Loken, Author, with Gruender and Kelly, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law. Claim that police officer unconstitutionally
seized defendant when the officer asked the driver of the bus in which
defendant was riding if there was any contraband in the bus and if the
officer could search the bus was without merit, as the driver consented to
the search and defendant was not seized during the search; while defendant
had a protected privacy interest in his properly tagged luggage stowed in
the bus's luggage compartment, the officer's search of the bag under the
mistaken belief it was abandoned, did not make his conduct after
discovering the mistake (having a drug dog sniff the entire luggage
compartment) unlawful, and all evidence suggests the officer's mistake was
an isolated instance of negligence which occurred during a bona fide
investigation; as a result, the exclusionary rule did not require
suppression of the drugs found in the bag; the drug dog's general alert,
under these circumstances, gave officers probable cause to search the
handful of bags, including defendant's, contained in the compartment.
Judge Kelly, dissenting.