DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
171517P.pdf 05/29/2018 Billy Stewart, Sr. v. Wendy Kelley
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-1517
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Beam and Kelly, Circuit Judges]
Prisoner case - Habeas. The state court improperly instructed the jury
that Stewart would would be eligible for parole after serving 70% of his
sentence if sentenced to a term of years; Stewart was actually ineligible
for parole because of a prior violent felony conviction. The jury gave
Stewart a 70 year sentence. Stewart claims counsel was ineffective in
failing to object to or otherwise challenge the erroneous instruction and
that he was prejudiced by the error because if the jury had been properly
instructed there is a reasonable probability they would have given him a
shorter sentence. Held, on this record trial counsel's deficient
performance in failing to correct the instructional error of the
prosecutor and the trial court did not establish Strickland prejudice
sufficient to undermine the court's confidence in the outcome of the
proceedings.