DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

171535P.pdf   07/19/2018  Colleen Auer  v.  City of Minot
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1535
                          and No:  17-1943
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck   
[PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Colloton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Employment discrimination. For a related appeal, see Auer v. Trans Union, LLC, 834 F.3d 933 (8th Cir. 2016). In this action, plaintiff, a probationary city attorney, alleged the City fired her for reporting harassment and discrimination and retaliated against her for speaking out at a city council meeting and unfairly damaged her professional reputation. Plaintiff was not entitled to a presumption that lost evidence proved her allegations as the record would show, at most, negligent handling of electronic records and not the kind of intentional, bad-faith misconduct required to grant an adverse presumption; plaintiff's only articulated basis for concluding she was experiencing sex-based harassment was that the City Manager compared her work style to the former city attorney, a male, and this evidence was insufficient to establish under North Dakota law that plaintiff reasonably believed the complained-of conduct was illegal; plaintiff never reported sex stereotyping and such a report could not have been the basis for her termination; claim that plaintiff suffered reputational harm from allegedly false statements about her job performance and termination in the affidavits accompanying the City's summary judgment motion fails as a matter of law as the affidavits were created well after the time of the supposed injury to her reputation and imposition of liability upon the filing would force the City to either withhold evidence or face potential liability for using it; plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to support a finding that her speech was a substantial or motivating factor in the City Council's decision to ratify her termination.