DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

171971P.pdf   03/27/2018  Terry Cravener  v.  Mike Shuster
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1971
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin   
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. The district court erred in denying the law enforcement defendants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity; the three deputies knew plaintiff was a paranoid schizophrenic who had not taken his medications, could potentially be dangerous, refused repeated requests to go to the hospital or lie on his stomach to be restrained, mimed shooting himself, took defensive positions and yelled "shoot me;" based on these facts, they knew there was a reasonable expectation that plaintiff would be aggressive and resistant; Deputy Maggard did no more than cuff and shackle plaintiff, and his actions in light of plaintiff's behavior, were entirely reasonable; Deputy Shuster applied an arm lock that broke plaintiff's arm, and he used nunchucks to obtain plaintiff's compliance; given plaintiff's refusal to obey instructions and the deputy's attempts to limit the amount of force used, the deputy's decision to use standard defensive tactics was reasonable; while Deputy Calvin tased plaintiff five times, he did so only after giving plaintiff warnings and attempting other less intrusive methods; under the circumstances, his use of the taser was reasonable; even if it was not, the deputy is entitled to qualified immunity because plaintiff cannot show that a reasonable officer would have been on notice that his conduct violated a clearly established right; the district court erred in denying the deputies' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, and the matter is remanded.