172012P.pdf   09/05/2018  Ronald Duhe  v.  Little Rock Arkansas, City of
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-2012
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Wollman, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. In action alleging plaintiffs' arrests at a 
   demonstration at a family planning clinic were without probable cause and 
   violated their First Amendment rights, officers had probable cause to 
   arrest plaintiffs for violating the Arkansas disorderly conduct statute 
   based on their personal observations, as well as information provided to 
   them, which indicated that the plaintiffs' use of amplified sound was 
   disrupting neighboring businesses and that they had obstructed traffic by 
   blocking the clinic's driveway; plaintiffs have standing to challenge the 
   constitutionality of Arkansas's disorderly conduct statute, but the 
   statute is not void for vagueness or overbroad; plaintiffs do not have 
   standing to challenge the constitutionality of Little Rock's Permit 
   Ordinance, on its face and as applied, as they were not arrested or 
   charged under the ordinance and they were not prohibited from protesting 
   even though they had lacked a permit; delay in plaintiffs' release from 
   jail did not violate their Fourth Amendment rights and was not 
   unreasonable.