DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

172079P.pdf   02/07/2019  Sylvia Perkins  v.  Joshua Hastings
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-2079
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
[PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Loken, Circuit Judge] Civil case - Civil rights. In action alleging defendant City of Little Rock violated plaintiff's son's Fourth Amendment rights by failing to adequately investigate police misconduct, plaintiff failed to establish a municipal custom based on failure to prevent police misconduct as she did not show the city acted with deliberate indifference to the rights of persons with whom its officers came into contact; the court did not err in requiring plaintiff to establish a pattern of constitutional violations to prove her claim and plaintiff's evidence of officer-involved shootings did not establish deliberate indifference to a pattern of excessive force; for the same reason, the district court did not err in granting the City's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim that the City had failed to train or supervise its officers; plaintiff's evidence was insufficient to hold the police chief individually liable for her son's death based on his decision to hire defendant Hastings; plaintiff's evidence did not establish the essential link between the hiring decision and the officer's use of excessive force; stated differently, the evidence presents no genuine issue of material fact that a plainly obvious consequence of the hiring decision would be the officer's unjustified use of deadly force; plaintiff's evidence failed to show the chief had notice that his training and supervision were inadequate and likely to result in the use of excessive force.