172164P.pdf   07/17/2018  Bottoms Farm Partnership  v.  Sonny Perdue
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-2164
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Wollman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Federal Crop Insurance. The clear language of the Federal 
   Crop Insurance Act indicated Congress intended to give the Federal Crop 
   Insurance Corporation extensive and broad authority, and that broad grant, 
   as well as the specific authority over the provisions of insurance and 
   insurance contract found in 5 U.S.C. Secs. 1505 and 1506, leads the court 
   to conclude that it must give the Corporation's interpretation of the 
   special provision dealing with rice insurance substantial deference; the 
   Corporation's construction of the policy language is not plainly 
   erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or otherwise not 
   in accordance with law; the Risk Management Authority's determination that 
   the Corporation was required to provide an interpretation of the special 
   provision of the policy was not clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious 
   or an abuse of discretion.