DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
172181P.pdf 08/13/2019 Melanie Kelsay v. Matt Ernst
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-2181
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, writing for the Court En Banc]
Civil case - Civil rights. Plaintiff brought this suit alleging defendant
used excessive force while arresting her, and defendant moved for summary
judgment based on qualified immunity; the district court denied the motion
and defendant appeals. Held: defendant did not violate a clearly
established right of plaintiff under the Fourth Amendment when he took her
to the ground and injured her, and the denial of summary judgment is
reversed; it was not clearly established in May, 2014 that a deputy was
forbidden to use a takedown maneuver to arrest a suspect who ignored the
deputy's instruction to "get back here" and continued to walk away from
the officer. Smith, Chief Judge, with whom Kelly, Erickson and Grasz join,
dissenting. Judge Grasz, dissenting.
172181P.pdf 09/27/2018 Melanie Kelsay v. Matt Ernst
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-2181
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Beam, Circuit
Judges]
Civil case - Civil rights. It was not clearly established at the time of
the incident in question that a law enforcement officer was forbidden to
use a takedown maneuver to arrest a suspect who disregarded the officer's
oral directions to "get back here" and continued to walk away from the
officer; as the takedown was constitutional, the defendant officer was
entitled to qualified immunity. Judge Beam, concurring. Chief Judge Smith,
dissenting.