172279P.pdf   03/25/2019  Anmarie Calgaro  v.  St. Louis County
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-2279
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Wollman and Benton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. Plaintiff's conclusory assertion that the 
   defendant County acted based on a policy or custom is insufficient to 
   state a claim and her allegation that the County made an erroneous 
   determination that her child was emancipated does not establish a a policy 
   or custom that County deprives parents of their constitutional rights; 
   claim against then-interim director of Public Health and Human Services 
   does not allege that she personally took any action that violated 
   plaintiff's rights, and she is not liable for the unconstitutional acts of 
   her subordinates; neither of the sued medical providers were acting under 
   color of state law; school district's decision to deny plaintiff's request 
   for her child's school records failed to establish a custom or practice 
   under Monell; school principal was entitled to qualified immunity on 
   plaintiff's individual capacity claims as the rights plaintiff claims he 
   violated are not clearly established; claims for declaratory and 
   injunctive relief were mooted by the child's attainment of the age of 
   majority.