172391P.pdf   07/11/2018  United States  v.  Deuvontay Charles
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-2391
                          and No:  17-3094
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Gruender and Murphy, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. This opinion is filed by 
   Judge Gruender and Judge Kelly pursuant to 8th Cir. R. 47E following Judge 
   Murphy's death. Even with the information defendant contends should have 
   been included in the search warrant application, a neutral magistrate 
   would have concluded there was probable cause to believe defendant and 
   evidence of the crimes would be found at the address to be searched; the 
   district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion 
   for a Franks hearing; the evidence was sufficient to support defendant's 
   conviction for committing a felony offense involving a minor while 
   required to register as a sex offender in violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 
   2260A; there was sufficient evidence to show defendant harmed the victim 
   and that her parent's request for restitution was appropriate; however, 
   while restitution payments to third party providers are permitted, there 
   was no evidence at trial that Anoka County paid for the victim's 
   residential treatment, and it was error to order restitution to the 
   County.